W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: empty metadata elements

From: Scarlett Julian (ED) <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:12:09 -0000
Message-ID: <F9BE3B1AB649D311A573009027852E4D02879531@EDUC_MXS>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

> I'm inclined to think that
> beyond simple assertions of non-critical information the use 
> of <meta /> is
> flogging a dead horse.

That may be so but for those of us in local gov there is a requirement to include it and I want to make sure that it works as well as a dead horse can ;-)

Thanks for the clarification and I think the moral is that I need to think carefully about which elements of our intended metadata set can have meaningful null values and which *must* be populated.

As an afterthought what does <meta name="DC.accessibility" content="" /> say to people on this list. To me it says that the page/resource complies to no known accessibility standard.

And for those of you who are interested in the UK central Govt approach to accessibility, their example usage of this is <meta name="accessibility" content="Bobby accredited" /> ;P

J.

 
The information in this email is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee.  If you are not the addressee, please tell us by using the reply facility in your email software as soon as possible. Sheffield City Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network.  If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended please tell us as soon as possible.
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 10:06:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:08 GMT