W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:55:54 -0500
To: John Foliot - bytown internet <foliot@bytowninternet.com>, "Scarlett Julian (ED)" <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>, "'Steve Vosloo'" <stevenvosloo@yahoo.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Cc: "'W3c-Wai-Ig'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-id: <014701c2cc7f$43a561a0$6501a8c0@handsontech>

I know, we just have to keep alert.

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Foliot - bytown internet" <foliot@bytowninternet.com>
To: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@comcast.net>; "Scarlett Julian (ED)"
<Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>; "'Steve Vosloo'"
<stevenvosloo@yahoo.com>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Cc: "'W3c-Wai-Ig'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:51 PM
Subject: RE: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace


onfocus  (besides, I said "playing"...)  no samples for public view.

JF

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of David Poehlman
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:41 PM
> To: John Foliot - bytown internet; Scarlett Julian (ED); 'Steve Vosloo';
> w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Cc: 'W3c-Wai-Ig'
> Subject: Re: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace
>
>
>
> and if I cannot hover?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Foliot - bytown internet" <foliot@bytowninternet.com>
> To: "Scarlett Julian (ED)" <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>; "'Steve
> Vosloo'" <stevenvosloo@yahoo.com>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> Cc: "'W3c-Wai-Ig'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:27 PM
> Subject: RE: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace
>
>
>
> uh-huh, especially since the user will in fact choose one of the 5 links
> (presumably).  Visual display vs logical structure.
>
> Links to "this", "that" or "the other" are, semantically, an
> unordered list;
> it doesn't matter which order you approach them, only that they
> are equal in
> importance.  I have an associate who has been playing with nested lists as
> "dynamic menus", where hovering over a list item "reveals" the secondary
> nested list, place and styled via CSS.
>
> JF
>
>
> >
> > I'm not sure I see the distinction. What is it about footer links
> > that makes
> > them different?
> >
> > Forgive me if I've misunderstood but what John is saying is that
> > a bunch of
> > links can be thought of structurally (and thus marked up) as a
> > list. Whether
> > that list is layed out vertically or horizontally, or in a
> > left-hand menu or
> > in a footer is besides the point.
> >
> > --Julian
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Steve Vosloo [mailto:stevenvosloo@yahoo.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:41 PM
> > > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> > > Cc: 'W3c-Wai-Ig'
> > > Subject: RE: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What I'm offering isn't a list, it's a series of footer links
> > > (e.g. not
> > > "Choose from this list of 5 links:")
> > >
> > > I see what you're suggesting, but I think if I had to go for strict
> > > adherence then wrapping the vertical links in square brackets
> > > might be a
> > > more suitable solution.
> > >
> > >
> > The information in this email is confidential. The contents may
> > not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee.  If
> > you are not the addressee, please tell us by using the reply
> > facility in your email software as soon as possible. Sheffield
> > City Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or
> > completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a
> > public network.  If you suspect that the message may have been
> > intercepted or amended please tell us as soon as possible.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 13:58:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:08 GMT