W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: RDF

From: Scarlett Julian (ED) <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:51:00 -0000
Message-ID: <F9BE3B1AB649D311A573009027852E4D02879417@EDUC_MXS>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

When I looked at this page (the rdf not the rss) with IE5.5 all I saw was
the source code. Am I doing something wrong?

Julian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Hanna [mailto:jon@spin.ie]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:28 AM
> To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: RE: RDF
> 
> 
> 
> > http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/index.rdf
> >
> > does anyone know, or have a decent guess, what tool was 
> used to author
> > this page?
> > What would needed to be added to check it with the w3 validator?
> 
> It validated perfectly at <http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/> 
> when I tried
> it. Maybe there was a bug when you tried that was since fixed.
> 
> Personally I am strongly against encoding HTML-as-text and 
> using it in the
> descriptions as was done here. However it's a common technique :(
> 
> > A decent plain english introduction to creating something similar?
> 
> http://purl.org/rss/1.0/spec is the spec. There are how-to's 
> out there but
> the spec is pretty close to a how-to (IMHO too close, but 
> that's another
> war/debate).
> 
The information in this email is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee.  If you are not the addressee, please tell us by using the reply facility in your email software as soon as possible. Sheffield City Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network.  If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended please tell us as soon as possible.
Received on Monday, 20 January 2003 06:46:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:08 GMT