W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: accessify.com's review of RNIB relaunch

From: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:22:51 +0100
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBLCBLIMDOPKMOPHLHIELAFEAA.jon@spin.ie>

> Any standards-compliant XHTML browser will reject invalid XML, if
> you declare your document as XHTML.  HTML is more forgiving and thus
> more appropriate for general Web use.  Why would you want to use
> XHTML in such a situation?

Well that's actually nice while you are developping the site (indeed I have
a filter on our test servers that replaces invalid HTML and/or XML with an
error message).

Wouldn't it be standards-compliant to flag an error but continue to attempt
to render?
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 07:21:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:10 GMT