W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: why XHTML

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:32:32 -0700
Cc: James Craig <work@cookiecrook.com>, tina@greytower.net, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
To: Matt May <mcmay@w3.org>
Message-Id: <877C48E0-A754-11D7-9537-000393D9E692@idyllmtn.com>


On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 02:17 PM, Matt May wrote:
> So? Same's true of HTML 4.01 Strict: Amaya refuses to render invalid 
> Strict content. But the other browser makers (rightly) assume that 
> it's better to accommodate the user by working around errors in 
> authored content than to punish them.

Where's the requirement that SGML-based HTML should not display an
invalid Strict document?

--Kynn

--
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                     http://kynn.com
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain                http://idyllmtn.com
Author, CSS in 24 Hours                       http://cssin24hours.com
Inland Anti-Empire Blog                      http://blog.kynn.com/iae
Shock & Awe Blog                           http://blog.kynn.com/shock
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 17:27:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:10 GMT