W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: why XHTML was Re: accessify.com's review of RNIB relaunch

From: <tina@greytower.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:20:33 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <200306252120.h5PLKX408637@localhost.localdomain>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

On 25 Jun, Matt May wrote:

> So? Same's true of HTML 4.01 Strict: Amaya refuses to render invalid 
> Strict content. But the other browser makers (rightly) assume that it's 
> better to accommodate the user by working around errors in authored 
> content than to punish them.

  Should we interpret that to mean that a user-agent should
  "accommodate" users by ignoring parts of the XML specs when rendering
  XHTML ?

  If so, any other parts we should have fun with ignoring whilst we're
  at it ?

-- 
 -    Tina Holmboe                    Greytower Technologies
   tina@greytower.net                http://www.greytower.net/
   [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 17:20:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:10 GMT