W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: accessify.com's review of RNIB relaunch

From: <tina@greytower.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:23:11 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <200306251623.h5PGNB407999@localhost.localdomain>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

On 25 Jun, Matt May wrote:

>>   But DOES it denote a sense of hierarchy, or a sense of importance ?
> 
> Yes, by design.

  Yes - it denotes a sense of hiearchy, or yes, it denotes a sense of
  importance ? The specs seem to speak of importance.



>>   Two <h1> ? That would violate the hiearchial model.
> 
> No, it wouldn't. Nobody said you can't have more than one <h1> in a 
> document. (Unlike XML, where you can only have one root element.)

  If the header elements are hiearchial, then you're saying that a
  hiearchy can have two roots.

  Clearing this up would be great - yet it doesn't change the initial
  concept: there is no reason why a h2 cannot exist without a h1.

-- 
 -    Tina Holmboe                    Greytower Technologies
   tina@greytower.net                http://www.greytower.net/
   [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 12:23:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:10 GMT