W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: "Think EUO, not SEO"/Google

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 14:50:08 -0400
To: Josh Hughes <josh@deaghean.com>, WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-id: <004701c33113$74261ba0$6401a8c0@handsontech>

If the link is worded so as to be clear, it would not be confusing.  If
someone can read and realize they don't need it, that is better than someone
needing it and not knowing it is there.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Josh Hughes" <josh@deaghean.com>
To: "WAI-IG" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: "Think EUO, not SEO"/Google



> There is no reason not to make the skip nav visible and it can aide even
> more people that way.

Skip navigation can be confusing to sighted users. And I could see not
wanting to have a link on your page that appears to do nothing for the
vast majority of your audience.

It should be fairly easy to differientiate between a Skip Nav and a
spam link. Skip navs are almost always simply links to anchors on the
page itself, whereas spam would probably be external.

Josh Hughes
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2003 14:52:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:09 GMT