W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: Is CAPTION always necessary?

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 08:50:29 -0700
Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
To: "RUST Randal" <RRust@COVANSYS.com>
Message-Id: <70001392-92B6-11D7-8C08-000393D9E692@idyllmtn.com>


On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 05:52 AM, RUST Randal wrote:
> Because I don't want to have the page title as 'Users' and then the
> table caption as 'Users.' Plus it's there in the summary. It's 
> redundant
> whether you're looking at the table or having it read to you. In my
> mind, it does harm. I feel like it's insulting someone's intelligence 
> to
> say, "It's a table of users." basically three times.
>
> My question is really about whether or not it causes an accessibility
> issue by not including the <caption>. I can't see how it would.

I agree with you.  In this case there don't seem to be any additional
barriers introduced if you leave out <caption>.

In fact, it's rare that a lack of <caption> would introduce 
accessibility
problems, especially if summary and headers are properly used.

Anyone care to disagree by providing a counter-example?

--Kynn

--
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                     http://kynn.com
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain                http://idyllmtn.com
Author, CSS in 24 Hours                       http://cssin24hours.com
Inland Anti-Empire Blog                      http://blog.kynn.com/iae
Shock & Awe Blog                           http://blog.kynn.com/shock
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 11:45:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:09 GMT