W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: Accessibility and web developer contracts

From: Matthew Ogston <matthewogston@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:00:01 +0000
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <Law15-F105xDAeys8FS000174be@hotmail.com>

Hi Tom,
I work for an eLearning company who develop soloutions for large 
corporations and the public sector in the UK. The particular clause you 
mention is fairly common in the contracts we deal with.

Normally, the clause is based around their own development standards (which 
may or may not include accessibility). Failure to meet their standards would 
result in my company having to re-code failing areas until it passed their 
strict standards (at our expense). The testing is normally conducted by the 
client owns dedicated standards department.

Personally, i would expect this clause in any development work we undertook.


Hope this helps?
Matt



http://www.ogston.com | http://www.accessiblenet.org


>From: Tom James <TJames@salisbury.gov.uk>
>To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
>Subject: Accessibility and web developer contracts
>Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:16:53 +0100
>
>
>Hi all,
>	I'm back on the list after a shortish absence due to a rather
>hurried change of job and location ... I've turned somewhat from poacher to
>gamekeeper, previously being involved as a developer / provider of web
>systems, and now being involved in scoping / commissioning such work.
>
>	Anyway, my question: I'm currently involved in writing a spec for a
>large web development project. The accessibility issues are likely to be
>considerable and complex, as some of the output is likely to be map-based,
>and some of it is likely to consist of data tables, possibly with
>multi-level headings. Would it be acceptable  (or even common?) to write
>some clause in the specification to the effect "we reserve the right to 
>have
>the accessibility audited / tested by an independent body / person / group 
>/
>whatever, with any necessary changes to be made at the web development
>company's expense". Has anyone (either on the commissioning or providing
>side) experience of such a clause - I must admit, I never came across one
>while working as a developer?
>
>	Many thanks in advance,
>
>		Tom
>
>============================================
>Tom James
>Corporate e-Government Officer
>
>Salisbury District Council
>3 Rollestone Street
>Salisbury
>SP1 1DX
>"Internet Communications are not necessarily secure, and therefore 
>Salisbury
>District Council does not accept legal responsibility for the contents
>of this message. Any views or opinions presented are those of the author 
>and
>do not necessarily represent those of Salisbury District Council.
>Anyone replying by email to the author of this message (or emailing anyone
>else, using the "@salisbury.gov.uk" address), is advised that such emails
>may be read by persons other than the intended recipient"
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
>service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
>anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
>http://www.star.net.uk
>________________________________________________________________________
>


_________________________________________________________________
Overloaded with spam? With MSN 8, you can filter it out 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail&pgmarket=en-gb&XAPID=32&DI=1059
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 10:00:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:09 GMT