W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: Respect - was Re: The two models of accessibility

From: RUST Randal <RRust@COVANSYS.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 08:58:14 -0500
Message-ID: <1A729C6059E7CD4CA1DFE3985E600421142FC3@fth-ex02.covansys.com>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Kathy Cercone said:

> According to Akoumianakis and Stephanidis, They reported in a 
> 1999 research study that the "Accessibility guidelines are 
> not experimentally validated". Which is one of my concerns too.

They are just 'guidelines.' They are meant to point you in the right
direction. They are not hard and fast rules, which is why I take the
approach that if the content of a page is readable and functional in a
text browser like Lynx, or in author mode in Opera with CSS, JS and
images off, then I've pretty much complied.

----------
Randal Rust
Covansys Corp.
Columbus, OH
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 08:58:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:09 GMT