W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: The two models of accessibility

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 17:14:42 -0500
To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-id: <002d01c2f965$43918aa0$6501a8c0@handsontech>

I agree but I think part of my point was lost.  writing to the rules with
guidance by experienced resources and good documentation should uyeild

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: The two models of accessibility

> least at the current level.  Accessibility allows certain behaviours that
> are predictable and verifyable through means that are validatable at least
> by humans.  Usability must be proven by a statistical analysis of "did I
> it right?"  I am not sayng that there not some well known strategies that

I'd say that that makes usability more measurable!  Complying with
testable rules is not the same as accessibility.
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 17:15:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:23 UTC