W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: Examples of alternative accessible sites

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 11:03:08 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <200212211103.gBLB38a10835@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

> > accessible versions, e.g. www.tesco.com and www.tesco.com/access.
> Is one of those seriously meant to be a "version" of the other?

I seem to remember that Tesco argue that they can only provide the
main site if they can use scripting, as their server is otherwise
overloaded.  Because of the registration requirements, I haven't
looked further, but one wonders if some of this is due to bloat.
Received on Saturday, 21 December 2002 06:04:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:21 UTC