W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: Alternative validation tools.

From: Asif <asif@studynook.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:38:03 -0500
Message-ID: <000801c2a889$39aead10$9701a8c0@necpro>
To: "Nick Kew" <nick@webthing.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Nick:

What sort of sponsorship would you need?

Regards,
Asif./

http://www.accessibleware.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nick Kew" <nick@webthing.com>
To: "Tim" <tim@wiseguysonly.com>
Cc: "'WAI list'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 7:08 PM
Subject: RE: Alternative validation tools.


> 
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Tim wrote:
> 
> > 
> > This actually brings up a good point.
> > 
> > With all the time that is spent on great open source "free for all"
> > products on sites such as SourceForge, what do list members actually
> > think is the reason that no large scale "open-source" accessibility
> > validation tool exists.
> 
> Tidy would be the nearest as of now.
> 
> I'd be very happy to open up AccessValet if I could find a sponsor for
> it.  Or some other way to pay the bills.
> 
> > By this I mean a tool that is developed in the true open-source way -
> > not by a for profit or not-for-profit organization, but by developers
> > not even connected geographically. 
> 
> We have a developer community into which that would fit nicely.
> The W3 Validator IRC channel is our main meeting space - dealing
> with a range of tools centered on but not limited to v.w.o itself.
> 
> -- 
> Nick Kew
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 19:38:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:07 GMT