W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: Alternative validation tools.

From: Tim <tim@wiseguysonly.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:59:32 +0100
To: "'WAI list'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c2a86a$b271d700$1a00a8c0@reliant>

This actually brings up a good point.

With all the time that is spent on great open source "free for all"
products on sites such as SourceForge, what do list members actually
think is the reason that no large scale "open-source" accessibility
validation tool exists.

By this I mean a tool that is developed in the true open-source way -
not by a for profit or not-for-profit organization, but by developers
not even connected geographically. 


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck Hitchcock
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 9:06 PM
To: 'Jonathan Chetwynd'
Cc: 'WAI list'
Subject: RE: Alternative validation tools.

You are right, I did not describe my views.  We made a choice and no
longer have such rights.


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Chetwynd
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 12:14 PM
To: chitchcock@cast.org
Cc: 'WAI list'
Subject: Re: Alternative validation tools.


You didn't describe your views on open source.
Have CAST signed away right to help develop such a product?

Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 15:58:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:21 UTC