W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: Ironic accessibility

From: Ineke van der Maat <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 13:58:59 +0100
Message-ID: <003501c2a1de$3d878b20$1d197e50@ineke>
To: "Hy Cohen" <hy@miplet.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Hello Hy,

You wrote:
They didn't even use ALT on their links. <grin>


Is not it  tragic (or to laught at) that such an "accessibile" web
design company-page needs an alternate text-only version as an alt will
be ways too long  to render it correctly in most devices and a longdesc
or d-link  nearly will contain the whole page text?
To render the text-only version correctly in all the browsers, the code
also needs a doc type .

Cheers
Ineke van der Maat



> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Vincent Flanders
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 2:45 AM
> To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Ironic accessibility
>
>
>
> Somebody submitted this as a candidate for the Daily Sucker --
> http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/. As the e-mail stated,
"The
>
> irony... A company advertising 'accessible web design' services in an
> all-image page."
>
> Discuss amongst yourselves.
>
> http://www.zylex.com/Access.htm
>
>
> Vincent Flanders
>
> Order "Son of Web Pages That Suck"
> at
>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0782140203/ref%3Dnosim/vincentfla
> nders/
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2002 07:49:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:07 GMT