W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: Accessible PDFs?

From: Steven McCaffrey <smccaffr@MAIL.NYSED.GOV>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 08:40:52 -0500
Message-Id: <sdeb1ca5.097@MAIL.NYSED.GOV>
To: <poehlman1@comcast.net>, <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Hi All:

I concur completely with David's statement here.
Thanks, Dave, for the most concise clear, accurate,  statement I've seen so far.

I can't speak for all who agree with this statement, but I will say that for me, my acceptance of this statement should not be taken to mean I think that work on making PDFs accessible in a wider number of circumstances should not be done.  By all means, continue work on making PDFs more widely accessible.
I don't think anyone here is arguing that work in this area should cease.
 
If you are a developer of web content and want to reach the widest possible audience, and you want to choose one and only one format, PDF is what you should not choose.
Now, if having the widest possible access is not your goal then, of course, this won't matter.
If you do want the widest possible audience, then either
1. Choose a format that can be accessed by the largest number of people, or
2. Choose a set of formats F1,F2,... such that the sum of the people who can access F1 + the sum of the people who can access F2 + ... is the largest possible.
If PDF is one of those formats, by all means, include files of that format as one of the multiple formats you use.
The only requirement is that the resulting information conveyed  by each 
of the documents in the different formats must be equivalent.
That is, all users should have access to equivalent information and/or services

I happen to be one who believes that the widest possible access should be a goal.

Steve

Senior Programmer/Analyst
New York State Department of Education


>>> David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net> 12/02/02 06:55AM >>>

It will be several years if at all before we can say that pdf is
accessible.  Yes, It is correct to say that There are some circumstances
where in it is possible to provide access to and accessible pdf
documents but those are few in the world and we already have a ton of
formats that are better suited for accessibility.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scarlett Julian (ED)" <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 3:33 AM
Subject: RE: Accessible PDFs?



Bob

that's a less than useful answer in that it doesn't really give a true
picture of the situation. Yes, it's true that AT cannot read pdf
documents
created using Acrobat 4 but (correct me if I'm wrong) it *is* possible
using
version 5 to produce documents that are accessible if the creator knows
what
they're doing. We are now in a situation where pdf holds similar ground
to
html in that unless the developer knows what they're doing the resulting
documents will be inaccessible to some extent. Given that people will
still
continue to use pdf shouldn't we be giving a more upbeat message about
how
to create accessible versions otherwise we're going to be stuck with
documents that theoretically can be made accessible but aren't because
the
creators don't know that it can be done. This is an *interest* group and
to
my mind that means exploring possibilities and trying to produce
solutions.
Or am I yet another who has seriously misjudged the remit of the list?

Julian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Access Systems [mailto:accessys@smart.net] 
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:11 AM
> To: Matthew Smith
> Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org 
> Subject: Re: Accessible PDFs?
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Matthew Smith wrote:
>
> nope, rarely, hardly ever
>
> Bob
>
>
> > Can anyone tell me if Assitive Technologies are able to read PDF
> > documents?  More and more "offline" content is being held
> on web sites
> > in this format, so it would be nice to think that it is actually
> > accessible...
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > M
> >
> >
>
>    ASCII Ribbon Campaign                        accessBob
>
>     NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail
> accessys@smartnospam.net 
>     NO MSWord docs in e-mail                    Access
> Systems, engineers
>     NO attachments in e-mail,  *LINUX powered*   access is a
> civil right
> *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
> *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
> THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
> privileged.  They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
> above. If you are not the intended recipient, Please notify
> the sender as
> soon as possible. Please DO NOT READ, COPY, USE, or DISCLOSE this
> communication to others and DELETE it from your computer
> systems.  Thanks
>
>
The information in this email is confidential. The contents may not be
disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee.  If you are not
the addressee, please tell us by using the reply facility in your email
software as soon as possible. Sheffield City Council cannot accept any
responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
has been transmitted over a public network.  If you suspect that the
message may have been intercepted or amended please tell us as soon as
possible.
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 08:42:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:07 GMT