Hi Jukka, On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:21:18 +0200, Jukka Korpela wrote: > A _general_ facility, yes, though it would probably need to be > browser-specific for practical reasons (different CSS support). > By "general", I mean something that stands on its own and it aimed > at helping people in Web surfing in general. OK, that shouldn't be too difficult. I have dabbled with IE's facilities, but have yet to test Opera and NS, although the impression is that all you need to do is provide a style for the body tag giving colours, font face and font size. I'll investigate it further. > Basically, it would be an interactive page (a case for using JavaScript for > accessibility!) where the user can select between some basic options or > enter options of his own, and get a style sheet back, together with > instructions on what to do with it next on different browsers. Did you manage to look at the accessibility page at http://www.sample.charityskills.net/accessibility.aspx? I was basically thinking on expanding on that by putting a link to download the file and a link to instruction pages at the bottom of the page. It's all server side, so no issues with client side javascript. > The difficult > part is to decide which features are most important and how to make it as > easy as possible to make an informed decision. True. The only think I haven't done is provide a facility for selecting your own preferred font, I believe the selection I have provided should be sufficient. Cheers, Julian VoelckerReceived on Thursday, 14 November 2002 06:54:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:07 GMT