W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2002

valid mark-up only priority 2!! WAS valid comments

From: Scarlett Julian (ED) <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:06:46 -0000
Message-ID: <F9BE3B1AB649D311A573009027852E4D02879240@EDUC_MXS>
To: WAI IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Thanks Jon - very eloquent ;-)

As a side issue then, why is it only priority 2 that mark-up be valid?
Surely this is the most basic building block of an accessible page and as
such should be priority 1. (sorry if this is old ground for some)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Hanna [mailto:jon@spin.ie]
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 3:43 PM
> To: WAI IG
> Subject: RE: valid comments

> It's not a valid HTML comment. Nor is it something that could 
> be even be
> part of any XML document of any kind. It is what is 
> technically known as
> "some random rubbish some idiot thought it would be a good idea to put
> there".
> It works because browsers are supposed to ignore element tags that are
> obviously wrong and although that can't be an element tag 
> (begins with an
> invalid character) pretty much all browsers (but not all html 
> tools) will
> recognise it as an obvious error and pretend it isn't there.
> Any tool that produces that is buggy.
The information in this email is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee.  If you are not the addressee, please tell us by using the reply facility in your email software as soon as possible. Sheffield City Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network.  If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended please tell us as soon as possible.
Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 11:05:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:21 UTC