W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2002

FW: Case closed: Disabled access does not apply to cyberspace...for now (US)

From: Sharon Dennison <sharond@hiser.com.au>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:08:53 +1100
Message-ID: <628E9B3004B47B4F889CB878D22CAF6005839F@BILLY.hiser.com.au>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Sorry if this has been posted already - I have just rejoined the list after being away, and thought this article would be of interest...

> Case closed: Disabled access does not apply to cyberspace...for now 
> By James Lewin 
> 31 October, 2002 
> http://www.computerworld.com.au/IDG2.NSF/a/000818A6?OpenDocument&n=e&c=ew
> A federal judge in Miami has dismissed a suit that sought to apply the Americans with Disabilities Act's anti-discrimination provisions to business web sites. U.S. District Judge Patricia A. Seitz dismissed the lawsuit filed by Access Now that alleged that Southwest Airlines' website violated the ADA because it was not accessible to the blind. 
> Access Now, a Florida nonprofit group that advocates accessibility for the handicapped, sued Southwest in U.S. District Court in June. The suit claimed that Southwest's site excluded the blind in violation of the ADA. Access Now filed suit to do two things; to get Southwest to make its site compatible with readers for the blind, and to establish that business sites need to be accessible to the blind. 
> The crux of this suit was whether the right defined within ADA prohibiting discrimination in places of public accommodation extends to "cyberspace". Federal Judge Patricia Seitz ruled that a Web site is not a place of public accommodation. "[T]o fall within the scope of the ADA as presently drafted, a public accommodation must be a physical, concrete structure," she wrote. Her ruling states that web sites are not a "place of public accommodation" as defined in the ADA. 
> In addition, the ruling scolds Southwest and the plaintiffs for not cooperating to find a mutually acceptable solution. Judge Seitz writes that it is unfortunate that Access Now did not proactively discuss with Southwest ways to improve the accessibility of the site. She also takes Southwest to task, writing "It is especially surprising that Southwest, a company which prides itself on its customer relations, has not voluntarily seized the opportunity to employ all available technologies to expand accessibility to its Web site." 
> For many E-businesses, this ruling may remove any sense of urgency about making web sites accessible. The ruling states clearly that the ADA doesn't apply to the Web. It also questions whether there is any standard for what an accessible site is, and suggests that it's up to Congress to decide. 
> Even though this case has been dismissed, it's clear that more suits are coming. Access Now has already filed suit against American Airlines, claiming their site violates the ADA. Many sites are making changes to improve their accessibility in order to avoid these sort of suits. While it may take years for the law to catch up with the web, companies can use the W3C guidelines now to make it easier for the handicapped to use their sites.
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2002 17:08:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:21 UTC