W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2002

RE: 508 vs. W3C

From: Robert Neff <robert.neff@uaccessit.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 23:40:28 -0500
To: "'WAI Interest Group'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000f01c24a5f$35441cc0$6500000a@computername>

Has anyone been tracking what each state has done or is planning?  

Does anyone have a grid detailing each state, requirements, dates
enacted, Dates for this to be enacted, or planning or status of

Robert Neff

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Judy Brewer
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 10:44 PM
To: Cynthia Waddell; Carlos A Velasco; Steve Vosloo
Cc: WAI Interest Group
Subject: RE: 508 vs. W3C


I believe that Carlos was describing the situation in Germany, not in
U.S., in response to Steve's question about Web accessibility policy in 
Germany; and that his response is accurate for that context.

With regard to states in the U.S., however, while many are adopting US
508, others are adopting W3C's WCAG 1.0, which addresses a broader 
constituency. U.S. Sec. 508 includes fewer provisions, and explicitly 
excludes certain constituencies such as those with cognitive

With regard to indirect impact across both public and private sectors,
biggest impact will come when organizations get serious about requiring 
ATAG-compliant software (authoring tools that comply with W3C's
Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0), not just WCAG-conformant Web sites, 
since that will help drive demand for authoring tool developers to
software that supports the production of accessible Web sites. So far,
of the only formal statements on this issue has come from the European 
         (long URI coming, and skip past the introductory material to
to the provisions)

- Judy

At 06:38 PM 8/22/2002 -0700, Cynthia Waddell wrote:

>The response by Carlos was not complete and could be misinterpreted.
>Section 508 has an indirect impact on websites other than Federal
>in the US.  For a complete discussion of this impact on entities doing
>business in the US, including how Section 508 informs US entities
>under the Americans with Disabilities Act and other disability rights
>on how to ensure effective communication through the accessible design
>web sites, please see my law and policy chapters in the recently
>book "Constructing Accessible Web Sites."  One interesting response to
>Section 508 effort is that a number of States have adopted Section 508
>policy or legislation because they want their websites to be accessible
>the widest possible constituency.
>Best regards,
>Cynthia Waddell
>-----Original Message-----
>From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
>Behalf Of Carlos A Velasco
>Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 6:23 AM
>To: Steve Vosloo
>Cc: 'WAI IG List'
>Subject: Re: 508 vs. W3C
>Hi Steve,
>Sorry for the delay in the reply. Unfortunately it is only applicable
>   websites of the Federal Government, not to other websites. It is not
>even applicable to state sites.
>Steve Vosloo wrote:
> > Hi Carlos
> >
> > Can you please tell me if Germany's requirement for level-AA
> > is for all govt sites, or also inclusive of public sites.
> >
> > Thanks

Judy Brewer  +1.617.258.9741      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, W3C's Web Accessibility Initiative
WAI Interest Group: http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG
Questions? http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG/Overview.html#Uselist or wai@w3.org
Unsubscribe? "Unsubscribe" in subject line to w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org
Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 00:40:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:20 UTC