W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: accessible navigation

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:02:57 -0400 (EDT)
To: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
cc: RUST Randal <RRust@COVANSYS.com>, "WAI (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0207120901180.32584-100000@tux.w3.org>

I agree with Dave. Being able to scroll and being able to see are pretty much
unrelated, so it is useful but should be visible.

Chaals

On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, David Poehlman wrote:

>
>it's actually extremely useful and even more so if they are visible
>because they help low vision users and those with motor needs.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "RUST Randal" <RRust@COVANSYS.com>
>To: "WAI (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
>Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 8:31 AM
>Subject: accessible navigation
>
>
>
>How useful is it for users of assistive technologies and text browsers
>to
>add two /invisible/ links to the bottom of a page - one that allows the
>user
>to skip back to the top of the content, and another to skip up to the
>navigation?
>
>Randal Rust
>Covansys, Inc.
>Columbus, OH
>
>

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI  fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Friday, 12 July 2002 09:03:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:05 GMT