- From: Andrew McFarland <andrew.mcfarland@unite.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 08:46:36 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 01:53 05/07/2002 +0200, Tina Marie Holmboe wrote: <snip/> > I have been doing a few accessibility audits lately, and I admit to > seeing > a whole lot of things which the authors clearly *believe* are > accessible, > yet are not. Can you give us a few examples of code which is believed to be accessible but isn't? (I don't think I'm doing anything I shouldn't, but you never know....) > How does the rest of you feel about the current status: are we moving > towards a more accessible web, or are people - not to put too fine a > point > on it - not giving crap ? I do a lot of websites for small businesses. Attitudes to usability and accessibility vary. Most clients will appreciate that a site is built with accessibility in mind, some want a particular inaccessible feature no matter what. In the main my clients seem to care, although they may not be aware of the issues until we explain it to them. Andrew -- Andrew McFarland UNITE Solutions http://www.unite.net/
Received on Friday, 5 July 2002 03:49:40 UTC