But each of the images are clearly identified with their figure number in the html and good and bad text equivalents are given. Isn't the purpose of accessibility that the site can be accessed. Or is it a slavish technical excercise. Harry Woodrow -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Tom Gilder Sent: Saturday, 23 March 2002 10:21 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Microsoft make an article about alt text... http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnacc/html/ATG_TextEquivalentsforIma ges.asp ...but don't bother to put any alt text in any of the images in the article page. Oh dear. -- Tom Gilder w3c@tom.me.uk --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 14/03/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 14/03/2002Received on Saturday, 23 March 2002 10:29:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:14:20 GMT