W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

assistive tech and layout tables

From: Michael Fry <MFry@electronicink.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:11:23 -0500
Message-ID: <53E4D39F99861F42915EC2E96393BD0402D88B@eiphl-mail1.electronicink.com>
To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I have a question about layout tables--I browsed the archives but didn't
find anything directly applicable, so I'd like to ask for your advice. 

I've been asked to determine if assistive technologies, e.g. screen readers,
can be "directed" by HTML (or something else) to read specific cells in a
layout table in a particular order, rather than linearly. (I think I know
the answer to this, i.e. "no," but I'd like to make sure I'm not overlooking
something.)

On a potentially related note, what do people think about providing
*several* 'skip navigation' links on a page, e.g. one for 'main content,'
one for 'main navigation,' 'local navigation,' etc. If the cells in a layout
table have distinct and "describable" types of content, would this be a
feasible method of giving users the ability to jump to their preferred
content (or table cells, from a developer's perspective)? Is there a reason
why are 'skip nav' links seem to be limited to one per page?

Thank you very much.

mf

Michael Fry
Human Factors Analyst

ELECTRONIC INK
One South Broad Street
19th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19107
www.electronicink.com

t 215.922.3800
f 215.922.3880

This e-mail is intended solely for the above-mentioned recipient and it may
contain confidential or privileged information.  If you have received it in
error, please notify us immediately and delete the e-mail.  You must not
copy, distribute, disclose or take any action in reliance on it.  In
addition, the contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software
viruses which could damage your own computer system.  While Electronic Ink,
Inc. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, we cannot
accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software
viruses.  You should perform your own virus checks before opening the
attachment.
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2002 18:14:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:00 GMT