W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: Thorns pruned - thanks! [long]

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:12:16 -0800
Message-Id: <a05101009b88dab363680@[10.0.1.22]>
To: "Steve Carter" <steve@juggler.net>, "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 11:16 AM +0000 2/11/02, Steve Carter wrote:
>  > Would it be just as wrong
>  > to use <span> and CSS to set the font?
>Given the above, no, because FONT tags are precluded by WAI guidelines,
>whereas SPAN tags are permitted.

Um...where's it say that?

Yes, I know that <font> is deprecated in HTML 4.01, but the idea that
<font size="+1"> is somehow worse than <span style="font-size: 24px">
is simply ludicrous. The spirit of the law is much more important than
the letter of the law. You can be equally inaccessible if you use
<span> and CSS as if you use <font>, regardless of what dogmatic HTML
purists may tell you.

--Kynn

-- 
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                 http://kynn.com
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain            http://idyllmtn.com
Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire          http://kynn.com/resume
Next Book: Teach Yourself CSS in 24       http://cssin24hours.com
Received on Monday, 11 February 2002 12:09:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:00 GMT