Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i>

kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com wrote:

> Charles wrote (about <i>):
>>It's also missing from XHTML Basic, which should be a clear hint.
> 
> ...a clear hint of what?  Inclusion in XHTML Basic can't be taken as
> anything other than a "hint" that...something isn't in XHTML Basic.



A clear hint that it's not really needed for Web documents.

Charles F. Munat
Seattle, Washington

Received on Sunday, 27 January 2002 04:20:11 UTC