W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i>

From: <kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 15:47:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200201262347.PAA28946@garth.idyllmtn.com>
To: chas@munat.com (Charles F. Munat)
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

Charles wrote (about <i>):
> It's also missing from XHTML Basic, which should be a clear hint.

...a clear hint of what?  Inclusion in XHTML Basic can't be taken as
anything other than a "hint" that...something isn't in XHTML Basic.

--Kynn

Received on Saturday, 26 January 2002 18:41:04 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com: "Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i>"
Previous message: Paul Koenig: "Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i>"
In reply to: Charles F. Munat: "Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i>"
Next in thread: Charles F. Munat: "Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i>"
Reply: Charles F. Munat: "Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i>"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:14:18 GMT