W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i>

From: Charles F. Munat <chas@munat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 21:21:25 -0800
Message-ID: <3C523CD5.1070701@munat.com>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

David Woolley wrote:

>>><i> is deprecated and meaningless.
>>>
>>Sorry to bother with an HTML question, but where is <i> indicated as
>>deprecated?
>>
> It's indicated as discouraged, rather than deprecated....

It's also missing from XHTML Basic, which should be a clear hint.

Charles F. Munat
Seattle, Washington

Received on Saturday, 26 January 2002 00:20:15 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Charles F. Munat: "Re: PHP"
Previous message: David Woolley: "Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i>"
In reply to: David Woolley: "Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i>"
Next in thread: kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com: "Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i>"
Reply: kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com: "Re: <strong>/<em> instead of <b>/<i>"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:14:18 GMT