W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

Fw: background-image in CSS

From: Ineke van der Maat <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 21:56:51 -0800
Message-ID: <00a401c1a0ae$195159c0$6da86dc2@xs4all.nl>
To: <accessys@smart.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

 Hello Bob,

 Thanks for your reaction.

 I  don't want to exclude anybody from seeing the effect.  In netscape 4.7 you can't see it because the background-image does not
exist at all.  Due to broken -css interpretation, I used
CSS to provide only the white background.

 Cheers
 Ineke
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Access Systems" <accessys@smart.net>
> To: "Ineke van der Maat" <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>
> Cc: "Harry Woodrow" <harrry@email.com>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 6:26 AM
> Subject: Re: background-image in CSS
>
>
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ineke van der Maat wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Harry,
> > >
> > > Look at my poemsite http://home.zonnet.nl/ineke.maat
> > >
> > > I use for the whole site a  very special background-image  (it is part of a tree-image)  only for getting an effect. The real
> > > background of that page  is white and the background-image has nothing to do with  the content of that  page....or am I
> wrong?????
> >
> > don't people with screen readers have a right to the "effect" you think is
> > usefull for some people but not others.   Why the difference?  Do you
> > think that visually impaired folks cannot get an "effect" or that they
> > don't deserve that "effect"??????
> >
>
Received on Friday, 18 January 2002 15:47:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:00 GMT