W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: background-image in CSS

From: Harry Woodrow <harrry@email.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:06:59 +0800
To: "Ineke van der Maat" <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>, "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, <jason@bartsite.com>, <jon@spinsol.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <LDEMKFBKJGCANBEJGEOIEEICCCAA.harrry@email.com>
You said used to get an effect....isn't the effect then content?

Harry WOodrow

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Ineke van der Maat
Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 5:36 PM
To: Kynn Bartlett; jason@bartsite.com; jon@spinsol.com;
w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: background-image in CSS


Hi Kynn,

You did not write it, but I see it more as sometimes, visiting sites.. I
don't speak about only backgroundcolours but images as
background used for getting  an effect,  but not fitting to the contents of
a page...

Greetings

Ineke

Kynn wrote:

> Huh?  Who suggested a background image that has nothing to do with > the
contents of the page?
>
> --Kynn
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2002 21:08:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:00 GMT