W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: Bobby inaccuracy?

From: Jon Hanna <jon@spinsol.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:16:57 -0000
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBLCBLIMDOPKMOPHLHOEMKDLAA.jon@spinsol.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Seriously, though folks, is alt="" meaningful to those of you out 
> there for
> whom alt text is useful or do you need something along the lines of
> alt="a thin horizontal image purely included on the page for visual
> effect and conveying no information whatsoever" ?

I can't talk for those who use text-only browsers for other reasons,
or in other ways (and in particular I can't talk for those who use
the text because of a disability - which is the focus of this list)
but when I use Lynx I would prefer alt="" for purely decorative
images. Often alt text that is put on an image so that it would have
an alt is worse than images with the attribute left out. (One of the
main reasons I sometimes use Lynx is that I'm often not in the mood
for someone's concept of "decorative" anyway).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBPEQrxYFpv9f1Mr0YEQJ33gCghkwS/THkPJl2SpBEjnPyILrdknMAn2rJ
pl8xxlcQUGgxWiB90Rm09nDG
=AdRj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2002 08:17:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:00 GMT