W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: more CSS and tables

From: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 00:53:15 +0000
Message-Id: <200201062151.g06Lp5H15580@post.cnt.ru>
To: Denise Wood <Denise_Wood@operamail.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Sunday 06 January 2002 15:15, Denise Wood wrote:
[...]
|
|   So I am just interested in seeing examples that Charles considers have
| been coded correctly and therfore overcome all of the issues raised by Kynn
| and Joe. If it is trivially obvious why is there continuing debate over the
| use of CSS versus tables for layout?

The reason for continuing debate is very simple:
there are different people on the list, they do have different experience and 
objectives.
If you continue to code in Tables - you do favour both to Microsoft and 
Netscape which together *invented* _broken table model_
If you code in CSS - there are some chances that your work will be better 
accessible by different categories of users.
It's not absolutely necessary (that your layout with CSS will be betetr than 
with Tables) - but it worth trying...
One important resaon which many people on this list tend to ignore is *HTML 
page size*. With all elements encoded with CSS, page size is much smaller.
Please do not ignore people using dialup - broadband access is still very 
expensive, even in some regions of US.  
 
|
|   Denise
|

-- 

Vadim Plessky
http://kde2.newmail.ru  (English)
33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE
http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html
KDE mini-Themes
http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/
Received on Sunday, 6 January 2002 16:51:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:59 GMT