- From: phoenixl <phoenixl@sonic.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 08:28:53 -0700
- To: phoenixl@sonic.net, poehlman1@comcast.net, ryonaitis@hisoftware.com, smccaffr@MAIL.NYSED.GOV, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi, OK. That's my general understanding of QA also. I think we probably should clarify any confusion about the software doing testing offline. Scott > Scott, > > Simply put it could be either, in a traditional/structured QA Approach a > Developer is not considered to be the best tester of something they > coded. It is best in structured QA practices that a developer will do > unit or "White Box" testing why there will be another group that > performs "Black Box" testing, so the person performing the interview is > not necissarily the developer. The Interviewer and/or tester is > generally a different group or at least a different person. This is not > to say that a developer should not test, they do. I think you will find > this to be the common practice in most Mid to Large Web Sites. There are > many good sites on the web that can better explain the different methods > of Quality assurance and the individual goals of each type then i could > in the size of this post. > > Cheers, > rob
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2002 11:28:56 UTC