W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: thoughts?Fw: Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site?

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:21:53 -0400
To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-id: <018701c2027e$553bc330$91e03244@DAVIDPOEHLMAN>
I forwarded it to the list because I wanted to take back something from
this list which I did take back.  We are not to cross post so I felt it
best to do this.  I have also encouraged people to look at the other
posts on this topic in the archives and to join wai ig if their
attitudes are right.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Kew" <nick@webthing.com>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 6:47 AM
Subject: Re: thoughts?Fw: Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site?

On Thu, 23 May 2002, David Woolley wrote:

> > Hum, anyone who thinks that Netscape 6 is html 4.x complient is not
> > doing
> > good web development work.  I not only do html 4, but a load of web

Who is this?  Are his views worth any more than his vague references to
"html 4.x complient[sic]" or "good web development work"?  Is there any
reason to suppose this was anyone other than a clueless deezyner who
thinks it should look exactly the same as it does in frontpage?

> I hope he has registered the problems with Bugzilla.

That would require the problems to be formulated.  If he can formulate
them for Bugzilla, then presumably he can also do so in whatever forum
this post appeared.

In short, why the **** was that post forwarded to this list?

Nick Kew

Available for contract work - Programming, Unix, Networking, Markup,
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 13:22:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:19 UTC