W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: Frames and accessibility: opinions please

From: Harry Woodrow <harrry@email.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:01:47 +0800
To: "Tina Marie Holmboe" <tina@elfi.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <LDEMKFBKJGCANBEJGEOIGEPMCDAA.harrry@email.com>
To get something that looks like frames is not that hard probably but is it
as easy as it is with frames to have a standard header and side navigation
and also allow users to include their own content in the main frame.

Harry

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Tina Marie Holmboe
Sent: Thursday, 25 April 2002 2:45 PM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please


On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 10:26:14PM +0100, David Woolley wrote:

> of frames but the big 2 wanted animation instead, so we got the current
> CSS positioning model which has great difficulty simulating frames layout
> to the satisfaction of designers.

  I admit to being confused. Simulating a frames-based layout with CSS 2
  is a rather simple thing. Which difficulties are you refering to ?

--
 - Tina H.

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/2002
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 03:01:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:04 GMT