W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities

From: Harry Woodrow <harrry@email.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 12:16:56 +0800
To: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>
Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
How many disabled users are there on the WCAG, I think you will find that
there are probably more people with disabilities and disability
organizations and developers with disabilities on this group than on the
WCAG.  If we are talking about making the web available for people with
disabilities isn't it important we give them a voice...and listen to them.

Harry Woodrow

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Kynn Bartlett
Sent: Thursday, 27 December 2001 10:13 AM
To: Charles McCathieNevile
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities

At 9:07 PM -0500 12/26/01, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>When this thread started it was about what are the minimum capabilities we
>can expect users to have (through their browsers). Very little data has
>out of it, so I am going to break this question into several smaller
>questions, and see if we can get more signal.

I think you were right at the start of the thread (and I was wrong);
the "minimum browser capabilities" discussion is a topic for WCAG and
not general IG talk.

I'll post a reply there.


Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                 http://kynn.com
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain            http://idyllmtn.com
Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire          http://kynn.com/resume
January Web Accessibility eCourse           http://kynn.com/+d201
Received on Wednesday, 26 December 2001 23:16:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:16 UTC