W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities

From: Tina Marie Holmboe <tina@elfi.elfi.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 00:33:12 +0100
Message-ID: <20011227003312.D6999@elfi.elfi.org>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 05:29:38PM +0000, Vadim Plessky wrote:

> I am, in particular, very much interested in CSS and how Mozilla renders 
> *valid* CSS code. Last time when I was checking Mozilla 1_0 targeted bugs, 

  I - for one - would be very interested in hearing an elaboration on
  this topic, as so far Mozilla is the only browser I know of which
  consistently renders CSS 'correctly'. In my opinion it is the only
  useable baseline browser for CSS at this moment in time.



> there were around 500 CSS1 open bugs and about 60 CSS2 bugs.

  There are - per the 27th of December 2001 - 296 bugs that matches 'css'
  on Bugzilla. Several of these are plain nonsense, such as #114341
  which states "ggnxp.com - This page looks bad in Moz/NN" and #114512
  "sandbox.com - Text is not aligned properly in browser" - the latter a
  result of the CSS file served as "application/x-pointplus" and
  subsequently ignored by Mozilla.

  It isn't alltogether easy to identify correct bugreports for Mozilla,
  since documentation has always been their weak point. I would estimate
  that around 75% of the abovementioned 296 are actually directly
  related to or correct bugs in reference to CSS 1 and 2.

  No matter. I use Mozilla 0.9.6 for my everyday browser, and have never
  regretted it.

-- 
 - Tina Holmboe
Received on Wednesday, 26 December 2001 18:33:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:59 GMT