W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Multiple versions of a web page

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 15:39:49 -0500
Message-ID: <006a01c18cbb$226c9940$c2f20141@mtgmry1.md.home.com>
To: "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@sonic.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
seems to me that if he was writing about accesibility, he'd have had a
perfect opportunity to demonstrate it.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
To: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@home.com>; "Scott Luebking"
<phoenixl@sonic.net>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: Multiple versions of a web page

At 11:25 AM -0500 12/24/01, David Poehlman wrote:
>Since the neilson report is inaccessible, I discount it.  There are
>better questions to ask.

I don't think that's necessarily the best idea -- nor have I seen
anything conclusive saying the Nielsen report is "inaccessible"
(I don't know; I just know it's way expensive).

It's possible, for example, for great wisdom to be contained within
a book, even if that book isn't yet available in electronic format.

Is Nielsen's book full of "great wisdom"?  I don't know.  But I do
know that we shouldn't necessarily dismiss it out of hand.


Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                 http://kynn.com
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain            http://idyllmtn.com
Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire          http://kynn.com/resume
January Web Accessibility eCourse           http://kynn.com/+d201
Received on Monday, 24 December 2001 15:39:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:15 UTC