W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Updated Bobby

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:31:24 -0800
Message-Id: <a05101005b8468c63e4ad@[]>
To: "Charles F. Munat" <chas@munat.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 10:24 AM -0800 12/19/01, Charles F. Munat wrote:
>Also, with the exception of the xml:lang attribute, what is in 
>"native" XHTML that isn't in "native" HTML? What part of "native" 
>XHTML isn't understood by browsers/ATs?

Native XHTML is the term I used for XHTML which is written without
regard for the HTML backwards-compatibility suggestions given in
the appendix of the XHTML 1.0 spec:


XHTML 1.0 is not fully backwards-compatible with HTML or with HTML
browsers, nor is it intended to be.  That is why the spec makes specific
recommendations for compatibility -- such as writing <br/> as
<br />.


Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                 http://kynn.com
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain            http://idyllmtn.com
Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire          http://kynn.com/resume
January Web Accessibility eCourse           http://kynn.com/+d201
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2001 13:39:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:15 UTC