W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired

From: Access Systems <accessys@smart.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 09:46:03 -0500 (EST)
To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0112150942080.29196-100000@smarty.smart.net>
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, David Woolley wrote:

also to add to this is the cost of linking to the net, many countries and
the USA on some plans charge by the minute/sec for access, and if the
lines are not high quality or capacity which can mean high costs for
qlitz.  and we are probably talking over 2/3 of the people in the world
have this issue

Bob


> > THe 2.0 guidelines are designed to cover the changed circumstance that XML
> > is the current way to present content and Presentation is separated by such
> 
> That is not the perception of designers.  They still keep asking on
> www-html for changes in the HTML standard after discovering that XHTML
> transitional doesn't support certain proprietory presentational attributes
> associated with frames and framesets (and most of them haven't realised
> that frames are deprecated and require semantics outside of CSS, with
> transitional XHTML).  They hanker for HTML (NS4) and HTML (IE5), not
> XML/CSS or even HTML (W3C).
> 
> Most content authors (and even more content commissioners) seem unable
> to understand the simple structure of HTML, so will want to stick with
> tag soup implementations of it rather than move to strictly structured
> XML (they are probably lost causes for many accessibility features, but
> I would argue that they represent the majority of real life pages -
> even the National Organisation for Disablities web page quoted recently
> was structurally broken, one of the reasons why it couldn't get level
> 2 compliance).
> 
> Also, from a generalised accessibility point of view, there are now 
> HTML appliances locked into HTML 3.2 (approx) which are the means to
> provide web access to those too old to learn new technologies (the
> video recorder programming syndrome) and which may well have lifetimes of
> the order of a decade.  Also, in many parts of the world people's only
> access to the internet is through machines that are too old to run
> the browsers needed for XML/CSS.
> 
> In the context of Bobby, one member of this list indicated that they
> have very limited financial means.  That, again, is an indication that
> many disabled (not those interesting to businesses, though) will have
> great financial difficulties in tracking technology - this applies to
> the "digital divide" more generally.
> 

   ASCII Ribbon Campaign                        accessBob                       
    NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail                   accessys@smartnospam.net       
    NO MSWord docs in e-mail                    Access Systems, engineers       
    NO attachments in e-mail,  *LINUX powered*   access is a civil right 
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
THIS message and any attachements are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
privledged.  They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, Please notify the sender as
soon as possible. Please DO NOT READ, COPY, USE, or DISCLOSE this
communication to others and DELETE it from your computer systems.  Thanks
Received on Saturday, 15 December 2001 09:27:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:58 GMT