W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:51:47 -0500 (EST)
To: William R Williams/R5/USDAFS <wrwilliams@fs.fed.us>
cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111211748560.4265-100000@tux.w3.org>
Aaah, but that is only becuase your browser is not meeting your needs. I as a
sighted individual can choose to use a browser that renders marked up
elements such as abbr and acronym and shows me the expansion, just as if I
was using a voice system.

If all the browsers out there were really good, there wouldn't be an issue.
But just as people need to make choces or use several browsers simultaneously
to get the best access with their assistive technology, people who don't use
assistive technology have to do the same thing.

Charles

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, William R Williams/R5/USDAFS wrote:


  Now, I will not argue the point too enthusiastically, and mean no offense,
  but here's my take...

  To engage in specific behaviors which favor one population group over
  another is discrimination.

  The term "discriminatory" is not inherently immoral or "evil," for I hope
  each of us are discriminating individuals -- going about our daily business
  making all kinds of distinctions: it's how we make sense out of this
  (oftentimes) senseless world.

  In the situation to which I was referring, the repeated use of
  acronym/abbreviation tags provides information to people using AT which is
  not equally available to people who do not use AT -- it's an inequity
  present only because HTML allows this to happen (and the developer
  implements it).

  Given such design, and despite good intentions, my access to and use of the
  information is not comparable to the access to and use of that information
  by one who experiences a relevant disability. That I, as a temporarily
  enabled individual, must scoll back to earlier copy to recall the full
  title of an acro/abbr while those using AT are provided the complete
  information each time is discriminatory practice.

  Bill Williams




                      Kynn Bartlett
                      <kynn-edapta@idy        To:     "William R Williams/R5/USDAFS"
                      llmtn.com>              <wrwilliams@fs.fed.us>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
                      Sent by:                cc:
                      w3c-wai-ig-reque        Subject:     Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use
                      st@w3.org


                      11/21/01 01:03
                      PM






  At 1:01 PM -0800 11/21/01, William R Williams/R5/USDAFS wrote:
  >In this fashion, individuals who are temporarily enabled are expected to
  >remember the meaning of the acro/abbr and so it should be, as well, for
  >individuals experiencing relevant disabilities. Web presentation does not
  >really change this logic; in fact, repeated use of the
  acronym/abbreviation
  >tags at each instance seems discriminatory in itself.

  Hold on a sec here -- there's nothing discriminatory in using <abbr>
  at every abbreviation.  It may be pointless for other reasons, but
  there's nothing discriminatory about doing so.

  --Kynn

  --
  Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
  http://www.kynn.com/






-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 18:36:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:58 GMT