W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Language -- am I being too vigillant?

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 14:40:15 -0500
Message-ID: <006201c16956$5b67fc90$2cf60141@cp286066a>
To: "Jeff Hiles" <jeffrey.hiles@wright.edu>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I believe it was the nfb however that coined "nonvisual" which to me is
quite awkward.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Hiles" <jeffrey.hiles@wright.edu>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: Language -- am I being too vigillant?

Although "people first" language is "the prevailing theory," as David
it, there are notable objections.

In addition to the New Zealand advocates Penny mentioned,
representatives of
the National Federation of the Blind in the United States have objected
"people first" language for a number of reasons. One is that "it is
tiresome, and repetitive, and it makes articles needlessly long." Might
have implications for the Web, where you want things short, clear and

"People-First Language: An Unholy Crusade "
by C. Edwin Vaughan

"The Pitfalls of Political Correctness: Euphemisms Excoriated"
by Dr. Kenneth Jernigan

Jeff Hiles
Instructional Web Designer
Center for Teaching and Learning
Wright State University
Dayton, Ohio 45435
(937) 775-3181
Received on Friday, 9 November 2001 14:40:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:15 UTC