W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: Accessibility and learning/cognitive disabilities

From: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 08:55:09 -0700
To: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, "Terry Brainerd Chadwick" <tbchad@tbchad.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <LNBBIBPIJNIHAGLGACIKEEFDFDAA.kerscher@montana.com>
Dear Terry and all,

While the DAISY Consortium does not focus on 508 issues, there are 	many
aspects of the specifications developed by DAISY that apply to learning
differences. The use of SMIL to synchronize text and audio, providing dual
reinforcement of content  is the key advantage. Also the powerful, logical
navigation model  organizes information in a way that helps every user.

To learn more about this, visit http://www.daisy.org

Best
George



-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Kynn Bartlett
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:24 PM
To: Terry Brainerd Chadwick
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: Accessibility and learning/cognitive disabilities


At 09:17 PM 10/31/2001 , Terry Brainerd Chadwick wrote:
>Last week's discussion on inclusion, and the lack thereof for people with
learning disabilities, along with Kynn's statement today that all-text sites
aren't accessible to people with reading difficulties, has piqued my
interest in the subject.

Hi, Terry,

There is not a lot of information about this within the general realm
of web accessibility, but there is plenty of information if you look
outside of WAI and web-specific information.

You have been told correctly that 508 does not provide for the needs
of people with cognitive disabilities.  WCAG itself is also weak in
this area, a problem which will hopefully be fixed in WCAG 2.0 (but
don't wait for that to make improvements).

Within WAI reading, you should pretty much read everything which
has been written by Jonathan Chetwynd and Anne Pemberton on the
WAI-IG and WAI-GL mailing lists. ;)  They are the ones who have
spoken up the most on this, and although they are often controversial
they challenge us to think and not forget about this population
which, honestly, has trouble articulating their own needs in a
forum such as this.  Also of value are Al Gilman's posts on this
topic, although Al tends to talk about a wider variety of things. :)

The body of knowledge that has been brought into the WAI continuum
is still very limited.  There's not been enough digestion and
synthesis of ideas so far, which means that when we talk about
web accessibility for people with disabilities we still have very
vague notions -- such as "use plain and simple language" and "use
illustrations."  We don't have, as web developers, enough
experience to know the full parameters of the equation, because
it has been an ignored issue for quite a while.

--Kynn

--
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Technical Developer Liaison
Reef North America
Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network
________________________________________
BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL.
________________________________________
http://www.reef.com
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2001 10:54:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:58 GMT