W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Web Accessibility

From: Jo Miller <jo@bendingline.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:36:34 -0400
Message-Id: <p05100337b7a2e43e5008@[192.168.1.102]>
To: Russell.coates@centrica.co.uk, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 10:35 +0200 8/17/01, Russell.coates@centrica.co.uk wrote:
>
>1.Can you please explain how this checkpoint relates to 'Frames' as I'm a
>little unclear as to what the text equivalent should actually be, is it a
>frame 'title' or should you provide a completely different non-frames page
>with the same content?


Russell,

The Techniques for Web Content Accessibility page addresses the 
subject of frames in more detail and provides code examples. See
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#frame-text-equivalent
and
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#noframes , which says, "links 
to descriptions of a frame should be provided along with other 
alternative content in the NOFRAMES element of a FRAMESET."

What you will need to put between your NOFRAMES tags to ensure access 
for people whose user agents don't display frames will depend on the 
content of your site. A set of navigational links that duplicates 
your top (or side) navigation menu may suffice.

(And as you mention, frames and framesets must also be given 
meaningful titles.)
--
Jo Miller
jo@bendingline.com
Received on Friday, 17 August 2001 11:37:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:55 GMT