W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Screen readers and full stops

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:05:33 -0400
Message-ID: <000901c124e3$54d4e8a0$2cf60141@mtgmry1.md.home.com>
To: <michelle.black@sickkids.ca>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
for now at least, I think what is deemed is proper grammar is the way to
go.  Why confuse things.

----- Original Message -----
From: <michelle.black@sickkids.ca>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:33 PM
Subject: RE: Screen readers and full stops



Many thanks to Simon and Phill for their feedback on this question. It
sounds
like some user agents can be set to detect ends of lines even without
periods,
and others may not. I agree that fundamentally the software that reads
information should be set to accommodate the user's needs, and that
introducing
new ways of writing just to try and make it work for all might be tricky
and
ill-advised.

Just to clarify, I wasn't considering putting the period at the end of
each
bullet point, just the final one. Might this be a good compromise for
those
users whose equipment is not set to impose the full stop? That way, at
the very
least they will get a pause at the end of the stream of bullets, if not
after
each individual bullet. I know that proponents of strict grammar might
say that
all lists should be punctuated as if they were in their longer,
multi-clause
form, which would include the final period anyway.

I tend to favour only the bare minimum, especially for low-literacy
readers, and
am happy to drop that final period if it will only make things more
complicated
for most users.

Thanks again for the help, and for any further input.

Michelle
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2001 13:05:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:55 GMT