W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: object vs embed + bgsound

From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 12:37:13 +0100
Message-ID: <006b01c11759$a5c27f80$44907bd5@btopenworld.com>
To: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
DW wrote:
>I've never found a web site with background sound that works.  The sound
always starts so late as to be simply annoying.

you obviously didn't bother to visit the link
http://www.peepo.com/crap/argo2/, or even our homepage

otherwise you'd realise that our sounds load before they are accessible
using tab or mouseover.
your response is unhelpful. please consider answering the question as set,
rather than the one you would like asked.

There is a serious contradiction in expecting that valid code should use
'object' if that word remains unsupported.
it is even more peculiar when there is a recognised work around.

jonathan chetwynd
IT teacher (LDD)
http://www.peepo.com         "The first and still the best picture directory
on the web"
Received on Saturday, 28 July 2001 07:57:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:13 UTC