W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Can the W3C HML validaor send email when the page becomes invalid (was Re: WWW: Interoperability Crisis?)

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:52:06 -0500 (EST)
To: Brian Kelly <b.kelly@ukoln.ac.uk>
cc: David Peaslee <peasleed@lanecc.edu>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101240148420.29917-100000@tux.w3.org>
Hmm. I think the sticking block here will be the load on the validator
service at W3C. It is currently one of the highest hit points on our site,
and there probably isn't the capacity to add periodic rechecking of things.
But there is no reason why someone else doesn't offer this service, even
using the validator (it is open source and there is a download available).

It's a useful feature of authoring tools - it is probably better to have
something like asWedit, XMLSpy or HomeSite have a local validator so that as
you author you know things are staying valid, or to use something like iCab
as your browser for preview - it has a little icon that tells you whether a
page is valid or not, and a warning feature that can tell you how...

Or you could use something like Amaya, which makes it very hard work to make
anything invalid...

Cheers

Charles McCN

On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Brian Kelly wrote:

  David Peaslee sent this message to the <www-html@w3.org> and
  <www-talk@w3.org> lists.

  A reason not to have a text-only page is the difficulty on maintaining
  separate resources.

  Looking at the page referred to in the message, I notice that it has an
  XHTML Valid icon, and is linked back to the W3C's XHTML validator (and the
  page is still valid).

  I suspect that many pages which started off valid become corrupted when they
  are updated.

  Would it be worthwhile suggesting to W3C (and other organisations such as
  CAST) that these validation services could ask for the email address of a
  page author, and periodically check that a page is still valid, and send
  email if it's not.

  There are similar services which will send email if a page contains broken
  links.

  There is a business model for providing subscriber-funded services - and
  probably not too much software development work needed to develop a free
  one.

  Brian
  --------------------------------------------------------------
  Brian Kelly
  UKOLN
  University of Bath
  BATH
  BA2 7AY
  Email: B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk
  Phone: (+44) 1225 323943
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "David Peaslee" <peasleed@lanecc.edu>
  To: <bmilloy@interlog.com>; <WStreett@mail.monmouth.com>; <chas@munat.com>;
  <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
  Cc: <sean@mysterylights.com>; <www-html@w3.org>; <www-talk@w3.org>
  Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 4:06 PM
  Subject: RE: WWW: Interoperability Crisis?


  I author a web page that uses both HTML and a text only page using XHTML.
  http://www.lanecc.edu/disability/disabled.htm
  Why can you not add a text only page for users who are needing to access
  informaton from your internet page?

  David Peaslee, AT tech
  Disability Services
  Lane Community College
  4000 E 30th Ave
  Eugene, OR 97405
  (541) 747-4501 x 2150
  peasleed@lanecc.edu

  >>> "Charles F. Munat" <chas@munat.com> 01/21/01 12:57PM >>>
  Wilbur Streett:
  "If you want to help the blind do it yourself, don't force the burden onto
  others."


  So he should go to all the owners of web sites whose pages are inaccessible
  to the blind and offer his services for free? Let's see, if he can fix one
  site a day, he'll be finished in, oh... where's my calculator. Hmmm. Well! I
  guess he'll never finish.

  What exactly are you recommending, Mr. Streett?

  Charles F. Munat,
  Seattle, Washington





-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2001 01:52:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:53 GMT