W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: screen reader; now: user testing

From: <tommc@scheitlin.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 18:17:14 +0200
Message-Id: <200106151617.f5FGHEU24778@zidane.inria.fr>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org


I have to say I think there is value in a screen reader simulation -- 
but I think it is most effective early in the accessible design 
learning curve, when a designer says "What does this thing look and 
sound like? I can't even imagine it." I use simulations and examples 
where it's helpful -- we all have.

For that, there is at least one simulation at 

To really get to know the software takes using it and Home Page 
Reader is a reasonably-priced option for that.

To really get to know the user experience takes watching the user. 
Sitting with someone who has to use a screen reader to be able to 
function with a computer will reveal surprising hiccups and a lot of 
insight. And that is the sort of learning that will help the most 
with applying accessible design to web sites.

Now I'm going off to follow Al's leads.

. . / tom mcCain

indianapolis, indiana usa
Received on Friday, 15 June 2001 12:17:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:13 UTC