W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: asterisks and footnotes

From: iris <iristopa@excite.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 08:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8725547.990028262969.JavaMail.imail@pugsly.excite.com>
To: W3c-Wai-Ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
no, they are not references that can go at the bottom of the page.  no, they
are not glossary terms.  no, i didn't write the content and don't want to
change it too much since it's an academic research paper.  

there are several tables of courses on this page, title of course, length of
course and attendance. there's an asterisk next to some course titles and a
note below the table ('this course was run in liaison with...'), which means
several items refer to this note.  i can't put it with the references at the
bottom of the page because linking back wouldn't be possible (several
items).  it would all become clear if you had a look at the page:

maybe i'm overdoing it a bit, trying to get this accessible?


On Wed, 16 May 2001 10:38:09 -0400 (EDT), Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>  If these are in fact glossary references (it sounds like it) then a link
is a
>  good idea.Especially if that is made clear by including the attribute
>  rel="glossary" in the link.
>    At 04:49 2001-05-16 -0700, iris wrote:
>    >hi everyone
>    >
>    >i'm just marking up a document with several occurences of asterisks
>    >words in data table cells which lead to a brief explanation or
>    >info that couldn't fit into the data cell but is placed underneath the
>    >(a footnote basically).  i was wondering how to make that accessible.
>    >
>    >should i put an abbr or acronym tag  or span/title around the asterisk
>    >put the explanantion in there?  what if the explanation is really
>    >won't that be confusing.  also, it would be repetitive, since the user
>    >then come across it twice, because it's still underneath the table for
>    >sighted users.  it would basically get read out twice by a
>    >
>    >with references at the bottom of documents i normally link to the
>    >and then from there back to the text, but that seems a bit overkill
>    >and confusing again.
>    >
>    >or maybe i should put title="additional info after table" in a tag
>    >it.
>    >
>    >what would be the best and least confusing solution?
>    >
>    >thanks
>    >iris
>    >
>    >the page in question is at
>    >i'm not finished marking it up yet.
>    >the data tables are further down the page (in grey).

Send a cool gift with your E-Card
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2001 11:51:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:12 UTC